FilmFont / Placement catalog

Placement catalog, measured not estimated

Every FilmFont page, how often Microsoft Copilot names it as a source, and who is featured on it.

Each row is a real page with the number of times Microsoft Copilot named it as a source, how that moved since the previous page export, and which companies are featured on it now. The numbers are Bing Webmaster Tools readings, not a model.

FilmFont was named as a source 5,019 times inside Microsoft Copilot in the 74 days to 24 September 2026, a partial window.

5,019
times Copilot named FilmFont as a source, 74 days to 24 September 2026 (partial window)
25
pages in this catalog
19
pages named as a source at least once in the page export of 21 September 2026
35
companies named across these pages
$300
featured entry on any page here, OWNED tier; dedicated review $600

FilmFont inventory

19 pages named as a source in the page export of 21 September 2026, ordered by that count. No page here carries a labelled placement today. Every row links to its detail page and to the Lattice library, where a quote can be built across properties.

PageTimes named as a sourceChange over 13 daysFeatured nowNext
Best AI Typography Tools 2026
10 companies named
1,372 +399 (+41%) since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
MyFonts vs Adobe vs Creative Market vs Envato for Video Creators
6 companies named
933 +160 (+20.7%) since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Best Sci-Fi Movie Fonts (2026): The Typefaces Behind the Future
5 companies named
328 +160 (+95.2%) since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Best Horror Movie Fonts (2026): What the Films Actually Used
5 companies named
321 +220 (+217.8%) since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Best Fonts for YouTube Thumbnails (2026): Cinema-Grade Picks
7 companies named
318 +196 (+160.7%) since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Can You Use Helvetica in YouTube Videos? Font Licensing Explained
8 companies named
185 +57 (+44.5%) since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Best Fonts for Lower Thirds and Captions (2026): Legible in Motion
4 companies named
167 +105 (+169.4%) since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Desktop vs Webfont vs Broadcast Font License (2026): What Creators Need
6 companies named
120 +30 (+33.3%) since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Are Google Fonts Free for Commercial Use? We Checked the Licence on All 150
no companies named
92 new this export none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Klim vs Commercial Type vs Pangram Pangram (2026): Indie Foundry Comparison
3 companies named
45 +40 since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Trajan: The Most Overused Movie Poster Font
4 companies named
27 +8 since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
How A24 Designs Movie Titles
9 companies named
13 +12 since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Captions.ai vs Submagic vs Opus Clip: AI Caption Tool Comparison
3 companies named
11 measured in both exports none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Font Licensing Calculator
no companies named
8 measured in both exports none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Font ID by Film
no companies named
4 new this export none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Can you use Bebas Neue in videos and commercial work? Licence explained
no companies named
3 new this export none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Movie Title Font Frequency 2014-2024
no companies named
3 +1 since 8 September 2026 none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Can you use Cairo in videos and commercial work? Licence explained
no companies named
1 new this export none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire
Can you use DM Sans in videos and commercial work? Licence explained
no companies named
1 new this export none featured Quote in the Lattice libraryEnquire

Per-page counts come from the page-level export taken on 21 September 2026, covering the trailing three-month range of the Bing Webmaster Tools page report. Change compares the same page against the export of 8 September 2026.

Also open for placement (6)

Published pages that are newer to measurement. Each is open for a placement; ask about any of them.

Enquire about a placement Open this shelf in the Lattice library

Already named on these pages? Preview the partner dashboard for your company: where you are named, what a standing position would hold in place, and where monthly credits could reach.

How to read these figures

What is counted. Each figure is the number of times Microsoft Copilot named a page as a source in its answers. Bing Webmaster Tools AI Performance reports this as "citations"; that is the only place the word is used here. Level: property total and per page.

Windows. Property totals cover 74 days to 24 September 2026 (a partial window: the property has not yet been measured for a full 90 days), captured 27 September 2026. Per-page counts come from the page-level export taken on 21 September 2026, covering the trailing three-month range of the Bing Webmaster Tools page report. The two reads are separate, so page counts do not sum exactly to the property total.

  • Being named as a source is not a click, a visit or a sale.
  • This is Microsoft Copilot only. It does not measure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity.
  • A company named on a page is a link, not an endorsement. Pages are editorial and may be critical.
  • Past measurement is not a forecast of what a placement will do for any buyer.

Property figure captured 27 September 2026. Page export 21 September 2026. Refreshed weekly. Schema 1.0.0. Machine-readable: /api/catalog.json

FilmFont sells clearly labelled placements on the pages listed here. Editorial position is not for sale. Payment buys labelled presence, never a rank, a score or a favourable verdict. Sponsored links carry rel="sponsored" and a visible label on the page itself. Full terms: disclosure and methodology.